National Electric Products Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 494 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 505 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 534 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.
315 U.S. 685 (1942) Cited 39 times
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid
Matter of Sauer v. American Car Foundry Company
280 App. Div. 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952) Cited 1 times
November 19, 1952. Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board. The decision under appeal resulted from appellant's application for the board's review of a referee's decision which had awarded disability compensation to claimant for reduced earnings on the basis of 80% disability. The board modified the referee's decision and award to a lesser and tentative rate of compensation based upon 50% of disability, held adversely to appellant's contention that claimant had unreasonably refused employer's proffered
Matter of Goodman v. Diamond T. Motor Car Company
222 App. Div. 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
November, 1927. Present — Cochrane, P.J., Van Kirk, Hinman, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.

National Electric Products Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.