§

NATIONAL CAPTIONING INSTITUTE, INC.

368 NLRB No. 105 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
NATIONAL CAPTIONING INSTITUTE, INC.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Eljer Manufacturing v. Kowin Development Corp.

    512 U.S. 1205 (1994)   Cited 82 times
    Holding that the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code's duration and citizenship requirements for permits under Texas' comprehensive regulatory scheme for distribution and sale of alcoholic beverages constitute economic protectionism and violate the dormant commerce clause

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Intertape Polymer Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 2015)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that "even if . . . leaflet[t]ing is construed as 'out of the ordinary,' is plainly insufficient to establish . . . coercion"

  5. Autonation, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 7 times
    Finding employer's claim that it fired employee due to job abandonment to be a pretext because employer knew that employee had filed for unemployment benefits and was under the impression that he had already been terminated and yet the company did nothing to correct the employee's alleged misimpression

  6. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  7. Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 12 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

  8. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 845 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    265 F. App'x 547 (9th Cir. 2008)

    Nos. 05-77400, 05-77408, 05-77419. Argued and Submitted November 9, 2007. Filed January 24, 2008. David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Weinberg Roger Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Petitioner. Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board Region, Oakland, CA, Regional Director, San Francisco, CA, Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., Kathleen Lyon, National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Compliance Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Joel W. Rice, Esq., Fisher Phillips, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Intervenor

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Grower-Shipper Vegetable Ass'n. of Central California

    122 F.2d 368 (9th Cir. 1941)   Cited 12 times

    No. 9577. July 21, 1941. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board against the Grower-Shipper Vegetable Association of Central California and others. Order modified and, as modified, directed to be enforced. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mortimer B. Wolf, Bertram Edises and Edward J. Creswell, all of