Monfort Of Colorado, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 651 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Teamsters Local 115 v. N.L.R.B

    640 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 25 times
    Concluding that "the negative aspects of the order overwhelm the marginal benefit"
  5. United Dairy Farmers Co-op. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    633 F.2d 1054 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 79-1807, 79-1883. Argued May 23, 1980. Decided October 30, 1980. John Regis Valaw, James J. Flaherty (argued), Pittsburgh, Pa., Stephen J. Cabot, Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick Cabot, Philadelphia, Pa., for United Dairy Farmers Cooperative Association. Hugh J. Beins, Jonathan G. Axelrod (argued), Bethesda, Md., Louis B. Kushner, Rothman, Gordon, Foreman, Groudine, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for Teamsters Local Union No. 205. Richard B. Bader (argued), Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel

  6. Industrial, Technical & Professional Employees Division, National Maritime Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    683 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 14 times
    Finding an issue fully and fairly litigated in part because there was no objection to the introduction of the crucial evidence
  7. Laborers' Dist. Council, Ga. S.C v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    No. 73-1341. Argued March 5, 1974. Decided July 19, 1974. Jules Bernstein, Washington, D.C., with whom Robert J. Connerton and Arthur M. Schiller, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Vivian A. Miller, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliot Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief

  8. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,862 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions