Modern Motors, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 504 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 314 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.

    128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 62 times

    No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with

  6. Olin Industries v. National Labor Rel. Board

    191 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times

    No. 13275. August 7, 1951. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., Gordon Epstein, Maurice Epstein and Allan Seserman, all of Boston, Mass., Samuel Leiter, Chelsea, Mass., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Frederick U. Reel, Atty. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, and Maurice Alexandre, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here upon petition

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Kennametal, Inc.

    182 F.2d 817 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times

    No. 10113. Argued May 5, 1950. May 24, 1950. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas McDermott, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Paul, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John C. Hill, Paul, Lawrence Wills, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARIS, GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. GOODRICH, Circuit Judge. This petition for enforcement of an order

  8. Carter Carburetor Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    140 F.2d 714 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 30 times

    No. 12636. February 21, 1944. On Petition to Review and on Request for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings on petition of Carter Carburetor Corporation against the National Labor Relations Board to review an order of the board requiring petitioner to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and, on request of board, for enforcement of order. Petition denied and order enforced. William R. Gentry, of St. Louis, Mo. (N.A. Stancliffe and John L. Farrell, both

  9. Gullett Gin Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    179 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 15 times

    No. 12798. January 30, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1950. Conrad Meyer, III, New Orleans, La., Lawrence A. Molony, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. I.J. Gromfine, Attorney, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nat. Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. While the order sought to be enforced contains provisions ordering the respondent to cease

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    106 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 23 times
    In American Manufacturing the court upheld the Board's finding that the discharges were discriminatory against union personnel since some of the persons who did not return to work were not discharged.