Minette Mills, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 651 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brookwood Furniture, Div. of U.S.

    701 F.2d 452 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 39 times
    Finding an interrogation coercive where it was combined with the threat of reprisal
  5. Southwire Co. v. N.L.R.B

    820 F.2d 453 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that absence of evidence that employer discharged any other employee for similar violation supported finding of pretext
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Daniel Const. Co.

    731 F.2d 191 (4th Cir. 1984)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that contemporaneous section 8 violations provide evidence of an employer's anti-union animus in the discharge of a particular employee
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Delta Gas, Inc.

    840 F.2d 309 (5th Cir. 1988)   Cited 16 times
    Noting that the Board's credibility determinations are entitled to deference unless "inherently unreasonable or self-contradictory"
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Jack August Enterprises, Inc.

    583 F.2d 575 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 5 times

    No. 78-1001. Argued May 2, 1978. Decided September 22, 1978. Bernard P. Jeweler, Baltimore, Md., Atty., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and William R. Stewart, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Richard D. Hayes, Springfield, Mass., with whom Sullivan Hayes, Springfield, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations