ยง

Midland Broadcasting Co.

93 N.L.R.B. 455 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Midland Broadcasting Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Telegraphers v. Ry. Express Agency

    321 U.S. 342 (1944)   Cited 669 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the principles of J.I. Case apply to RLA cases

  2. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 456 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.

    128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 62 times

    No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with

  5. Singer Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    119 F.2d 131 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 37 times
    In Singer Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 119 F.2d 131, 134, the court said: "* * * The greatest of rascals may solemnly affirm his honesty of purpose; that does not foreclose a jury from finding from the evidence submitted that he possesses no trace of such innocent quality.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. P. Lorillard Co.

    117 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1941)   Cited 16 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Company, 6 Cir., 117 F.2d 921, 926, where lapse of time and changed conditions demonstrated a shift in sentiment of employees with respect to their choice of a collective bargaining agency, this court enforced but modified the Board's order so as to require the conduct of a new election.

  7. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment