§

Mercy Health Partners

358 N.L.R.B. 566 (N.L.R.B. 2012)
Mercy Health Partners

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 730 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 268 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Spurlino Materials, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    645 F.3d 870 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 8 times
    Establishing new employee evaluation system was mandatory subject of bargaining

  4. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 150-A v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    1 F.3d 24 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 26 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court may not certify a class without ruling that each Rule 23 requirement is met, even if a requirement overlaps with a merits issue

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. JLL Restaurant, Inc.

    325 F. App'x 577 (9th Cir. 2009)   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 07-74755. Submitted May 8, 2009. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Filed May 12, 2009. Regional Director Region 21, Los Angeles, CA, Linda Dreeben, Esq., Aileen A. Armstrong, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Mark Theodore, Proskauer Rose LLP, Edward M. Wolkowitz, Esq., Robinson, Diamant Wolkowitz, Los Angeles, CA, Ellen Greenstone, Esq., Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Respondents. On Application for Enforcement

  6. N.L.R.B. v. National Car Rental System

    672 F.2d 1182 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that a bargaining representative cannot be imposed on employees who do not wish to be represented

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Baltimore News Am. Division

    590 F.2d 554 (4th Cir. 1979)   Cited 9 times
    In Baltimore News, however, the employer offered the enhanced early retirement program directly to individual employees after reaching a bargaining impasse with the union over the proposed change.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Huttig Sash Door Co.

    377 F.2d 964 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 13 times

    No. 18451. May 31, 1967. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Edith E. Nash, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with her on the brief. George V. Gardner and Frederick F. Holroyd of Gardner Gandal, Charleston, W. Va., for respondent. Before BLACKMUN, MEHAFFY and LAY, Circuit Judges. BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. We are here primarily concerned with an application of the