§
Melton v. Comm'r

5 Cited authorities

  1. Burk-Waggoner Assn. v. Hopkins

    269 U.S. 110 (1925)   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding associations considered partnerships under State law were nevertheless taxable as corporations

  2. Scudder v. Union National Bank

    91 U.S. 406 (1875)   Cited 168 times
    In Scudder v. Union National Bank, 91 U.S. 406, the broad statement of the foregoing cases was somewhat narrowed, and it was stated that the law prevailing at the place of the performance of a contract regulated matters connected with its performance, and that matters bearing upon the execution, interpretation and validity of the contract were determined by the law of the place where it was made.

  3. Gaston, Etc., Ltd. v. Warner

    260 U.S. 201 (1922)   Cited 21 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 59. Argued October 13, 1922. Decided November 13, 1922. The Canadian owner of a British ship of a Canadian port made a contract in New York with W, a citizen of that State, authorizing him to offer the vessel for a specified price and agreeing to pay him a specified commission for securing a purchaser. W introduced purchasers with whom the owner agreed for a charter and sale at that price, the ship to be delivered and the price

  4. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. Mitchell

    103 P. 720 (Okla. 1909)   Cited 27 times

    No. 2226, Okla. T. Opinion Filed July 13, 1909. 1. PARTNERSHIP — Creation — Contract. A partnership is a relation arising out of a contract to do certain things, and exists only where the parties intend to enter into such a contract, and, unless they have estopped themselves by holding themselves out to the world as partners, their intentions, as derived from the contract, are decisive. (a) M. and C. entering into a contract, by which each is to have a one-half interest, one to perform certain duties

  5. Perry et al. v. Jones

    150 P. 168 (Okla. 1915)   Cited 6 times

    No. 4140 Opinion Filed June 22, 1915. COVENANTS — Evidence — Partition — Tenancy in Common — Construction — Covenants of Warranty — Voluntary Partition. On and prior to July 17, 1903, J. and P. and D. were the joint owners of the unsold lots in ten town sites in Oklahoma, the legal title to which was in J., as trustee for himself and P. and D. J. owned an undivided one-half interest therein, and P. and D. owned the other, in equal parts. On July 17, 1903, they made a division of their joint property