§

Mel Croan Motors, Inc.

163 N.L.R.B. 601 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Mel Croan Motors, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Dyer v. MacDougall

    201 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 321 times
    Holding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WTVJ, Inc.

    268 F.2d 346 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 16 times
    Enforcing Board decision that found violation based on a theory of wrongdoing different from the theory relied upon by the ALJ

  4. IMCO CONTAINER CO. OF HARRISONBURG v. N.L.R.B

    346 F.2d 178 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 5 times

    No. 9627. Argued March 3, 1965. Decided May 7, 1965. Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo. (Herschel Phillips and Philip W. Polgreen, Los Angeles, Cal., and Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, Mo., on brief), for petitioner. Anthony J. Obadal, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex

    229 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 12 times

    No. 15690. February 10, 1956. Victor H. Hess, Jr., Reg. Atty. N.L.R.B., New Orleans, La., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Arnold Ordman, William J. Avrutis, Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Henry J. Read, New Orleans, La., John M. Scott, Fort Worth, Tex., Samuels, Brown, Herman Scott, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and

  6. Gullett Gin Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    179 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 15 times

    No. 12798. January 30, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1950. Conrad Meyer, III, New Orleans, La., Lawrence A. Molony, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. I.J. Gromfine, Attorney, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nat. Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. While the order sought to be enforced contains provisions ordering the respondent to cease

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  8. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    200 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 14079. December 2, 1952. Roy C. Ledbetter, Dallas, Tex., James T. Fitzpatrick, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner. Samuel M. Singer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Feeling itself aggrieved by the findings and order of the Board, petitioner seeks to set the order aside while the Board, in