§

Mark D. v. Dep’t of Justice

EEOC Appeal No. 2019001549 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 24, 2019)
Mark D. v. Dep’t of Justice

15 Cited authorities

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,622 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  2. Day v. Mathews

    530 F.2d 1083 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 101 times
    In Day v. Mathews, 530 F.2d 1083 (D.C. Cir. 1976), there was conceded proof that the Department of Health, Education and Welfare had treated Mr. Day's applications for promotion in discriminatory fashion.

  3. Hairston v. McLean Trucking Co.

    520 F.2d 226 (4th Cir. 1975)   Cited 61 times
    In Hairston, the district court denied back pay to some members of a class who were systematically discriminated against in employment because of race. Hairston, supra, 520 F.2d at 229.

  4. Smallwood v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    728 F.2d 614 (4th Cir. 1984)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that absent the discrimination, "the defendant would unquestionably not have found the plaintiff qualified for employment"

  5. Marks v. Prattco, Inc.

    633 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 31 times
    Rejecting the argument in a Title VII case that attorney fees are not available under discrimination statute for work on appeal, and finding instead that the authority to award attorney fees covers fees incurred during the "entire course of this unnecessarily protracted litigation," including challenges on appeal

  6. Mallard v. Claytor

    471 F. Supp. 16 (D.D.C. 1978)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 76-1340. January 31, 1978. June D.W. Kalijarvi, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Stephen S. Cowen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Charles R. RICHEY, District Judge. The above-entitled cause came on for trial before the Court, sitting without a jury, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which gave federal employees in executive

  7. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,994 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"

  8. Section 1614.407 - Civil action: Title VII, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Rehabilitation Act, Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, and Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.407   Cited 747 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing civil actions if no final action is taken within 180 days after a complaint is filed

  9. Section 1614.408 - Civil action: Equal Pay Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.408   Cited 113 times
    Requiring that the complainant wait at least 180 days for a decision from the agency before filing a civil action and requiring that such an action be filed within 90 days of a final decision

  10. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"

  11. Section 1614.503 - Enforcement of final Commission decisions

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.503   Cited 64 times
    Describing civil action for enforcement of administrative award

  12. Section 1614.409 - Effect of filing a civil action

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.409   Cited 50 times
    Stating that: "Filing a civil action under § 1614.408 or § 1614.409 shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal"

  13. Section 1614.501 - Remedies and relief

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.501   Cited 42 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating § 1920 into the regulations

  14. Section 1614.403 - How to appeal

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.403   Cited 34 times
    Indicating that failure to file timely appeal requires dismissal by EEOC

  15. Section 1614.606 - Joint processing and consolidation of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.606   Cited 5 times

    Complaints of discrimination filed by two or more complainants consisting of substantially similar allegations of discrimination or relating to the same matter may be consolidated by the agency or the Commission for joint processing after appropriate notification to the parties. Two or more complaints of discrimination filed by the same complainant shall be consolidated by the agency for joint processing after appropriate notification to the complainant. When a complaint has been consolidated with