Majestic Metal Specialties, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 316 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  2. Labor Board v. Newport News Co.

    308 U.S. 241 (1939)   Cited 119 times
    Upholding finding of domination where company determined structure of organization and could choose whether to adopt recommendations
  3. Labor Board v. Southern Bell Co.

    319 U.S. 50 (1943)   Cited 42 times
    In Seber, the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar statute which provided that certain Indian lands would be immune from state taxes if two requirements were met: that the title to the lands be held by an Indian subject to restrictions against alienation or encumbrance or approval of the Secretary of the Interior; and the lands were purchased out of trust or restricted funds.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bailey Co.

    180 F.2d 278 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 23 times

    No. 10883. February 13, 1950. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Frederick U. Reel, and Albert Gore, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Welles K. Stanley, Eugene B. Schwartz, Carl H. Clark, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief; Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of

  5. International, Etc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    110 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1939)   Cited 36 times
    In International Association of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 App.D.C. 175, 110 F.2d 29, 46, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia makes plain that the decision as to what is an appropriate bargaining unit under the circumstances is a delicate one which has been delegated by Congress to the Board.
  6. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    112 F.2d 657 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 34 times
    In Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 657, 660, a disestablishment order was sustained in a much weaker case than the present.
  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Fred P. Weissman

    170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) and N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Mfg. Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), the ownership of the successor was substantially the same as that of the predecessor.
  8. Wilson Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    123 F.2d 411 (8th Cir. 1941)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 496, 497. November 10, 1941. Rehearing Denied November 29, 1941. Petitions to Review Orders of National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Wilson Co., Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the Board issued against petitioner pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act. The National Labor Relations Board, in its answer, requested enforcement of its order. Order modified, and, as so modified, affirmed and enforced. Paul Ware, of Chicago, Ill. (James

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Booker

    180 F.2d 727 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 10 times

    No. 12744. February 6, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 11, 1950. Rehearing Granted April 10, 1950. Further Rehearing Denied June 16, 1950. Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Attorney NLRB, Atlanta, Georgia, David P. Finding, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert M. Hitch, Jr., Savannah, Georgia, Malberry Smith, Jr., Savannah, Georgia, for respondent. Before HOLMES, WALLER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. HOLMES, Circuit Judge

  10. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    113 F.2d 992 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 18 times
    In Western Union Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 113 F.2d 992 (2nd Cir. 1940), the Board insisted that a union was dominated by the company although the employees had agreed to a checkoff of union dues.