No. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court
No. 11223. July 9, 1951. Donald K. Merwin, Richard G. McCuskey, Canton, Ohio (Donald K. Merwin, Richard G. McCuskey, Canton, Ohio, on the brief, Black, McCuskey, Souers Arbaugh, Canton, Ohio, of counsel), for petitioner. Herschel Kriger, Canton, Ohio (Herschel Kriger, Canton, Ohio, on the brief), for charging parties amicus curiae. Isadore J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David Findling, A Norman Somers, Owsley Vose, and Arnold Ordman, all of Washington, D.C. on the brief), for respondent
No. 12750. January 30, 1950. T. Lowry Whittaker, Chief Legal Officer, National Labor Relations Bd., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bentley G. Byrnes, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Based upon findings that respondent had engaged, and