§

Machinists, District Lodge 160, Local Lodge 289 (SSA Marine)

360 N.L.R.B. 520 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Machinists, District Lodge 160, Local Lodge 289 (SSA Marine)

7 Cited authorities

  1. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union No. 27 v. E.P. Donnelly, Inc.

    737 F.3d 879 (3d Cir. 2013)   Cited 132 times
    Finding breach of contract requires "failure of defendant to perform its obligations under contract"

  2. Little Crow Mill. v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad

    476 U.S. 1158 (1986)   Cited 92 times
    Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79

    404 U.S. 116 (1971)   Cited 101 times
    Upholding NLRB authority to determine merits of jurisdictional dispute notwithstanding an IJDB work assignment, where the competing unions but not the employer had agreed to be bound by the IJDB decision

  4. Local 30, United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    1 F.3d 1419 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that maintenance of a suit by the losing union in an NLRB jurisdictional dispute to confirm a corresponding favorable arbitration award amounts to an unfair labor practice

  5. Intern. Longshoremen's v. Pacific Maritime

    773 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 30 times
    Finding union's attempt to enforce an arbitration award that was inconsistent with a prior section 10(k) proceeding constituted an unfair labor practice

  6. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    884 F.2d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 21 times
    Finding union cannot assert contract claims in contravention of an existing 10(k) award and thereby frustrate the purpose of section 10(k); "a union cannot force an employer to choose between a Board section 10(k) award and a squarely contrary contract claim"

  7. Parsons v. Sanchez

    46 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that, when movant waived his right to appeal any sentence issues, he did not waive his right to collaterally attack his sentence with a § 2225 motion grounded in ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary plea