§

Litho Press of San Antonio

211 N.L.R.B. 1014 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Litho Press of San Antonio

3 Cited authorities

  1. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 316 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  2. Southwire Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    393 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 2 times

    No. 24841. April 8, 1968. Frank M. Swift, Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Morgan C. Stanford, Atlanta, Ga. (Intervenor), for respondent. Adair, Goldthwaite, Standford Daniel, Atlanta, Ga., Irving Abramson, Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Associate Gen. Counsel, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor, Industrial Union

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Dal-Tex Optical Company

    378 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1967)

    No. 23826. June 8, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Harold B. Shore, Herman M. Levy, Attys., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Emil Corenbleth, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Ruth Weyand, Irving Abramson, Washing, D.C., Leonard Greenwald, New York City, for Intervenor International Union of Elec., Radio Mach. Workers. Before BELL, GODBOLD, and DYER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The question presented