LAURUS TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
20 Cited authorities
Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith
487 U.S. 1205 (1988) Cited 105 times 6 Legal AnalysesUpholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 356 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Cited 96 times 37 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal AnalysesFinding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
Prill v. N.L.R.B
755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 80 times 3 Legal AnalysesIn Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B
335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 24 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors
Evans v. Stephens
387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004) Cited 15 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment
N.L.R.B. v. Interstate Builders, Inc.
351 F.3d 1020 (10th Cir. 2003) Cited 15 timesDescribing scope of review as "quite narrow"
Double Eagle Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B
414 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2005) Cited 10 timesSustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information
Prill v. N.L.R.B
835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 27 times 8 Legal AnalysesRecognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”