§

Laborers International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio, Local No. 389

287 N.L.R.B. 570 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Laborers International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio, Local No. 389

12 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  4. U.S. Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers

    598 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 46 times
    Noting that a substantial compliance defense is available in civil contempt

  5. American Bread Company v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 33 times
    In American Bread, it was physically possible for consumers to bring their own bread or go without, just as it was possible for Kroger shoppers to bring their own bags or go without.

  6. Intern. Ass'n of Bridge, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times
    Enforcing Board's order finding unlawful inducement in part based on conversations at neutral employer's office gate between union agent and neutral employees who failed to report for work later that day, even though there was no testimony regarding the content of the conversations

  7. Ramey Const. Co., Inc. v. Local U. No. 544

    472 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1275. January 31, 1973. John Cosmic, John W. Broadfoot, Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants. Tom Upchurch, Jr., Amarillo, Tex., Buddy Wright, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Before RIVES, THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the legality of common situs picketing conducted by the defendant-union on numerous construction sites in the Amarillo,

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Local 182, Int. Bro. of Teamsters

    314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 26 times

    No. 224, Docket 27524. Argued December 4, 1962. Decided January 28, 1963. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C., Attys.), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., submitted brief for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. L. Un. No. 55

    218 F.2d 226 (10th Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times
    Recognizing amendments made closed-shop agreements illegal