§

Knickerbocker Plastic Co., Inc.

96 N.L.R.B. 586 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Knickerbocker Plastic Co., Inc.

24 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,124 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

  2. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  4. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  5. Labor Board v. Waterman S.S. Co.

    309 U.S. 206 (1940)   Cited 219 times
    Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men

  6. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  7. Labor Board v. Fruehauf Co.

    301 U.S. 49 (1937)   Cited 35 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 420 and 421. Argued February 11, 1937. Decided April 12, 1937. The National Labor Relations Act, and orders made under it by the National Labor Relations Board, sustained upon the authority of National Labor Relations Board v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp., ante, p. 1, as applied to a manufacturer of commercial "trailers," (vehicles designed for the transportation of merchandise), having its factory in Michigan, but which obtained

  8. Sax v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    171 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 33 times
    In Sax v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 171 F.2d 769 (1948), and N.L.R.B. v. Armour Co., 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 625 (1954), the "perfunctory, innocuous remarks" stood "alone".

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.

    116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.

  10. Carter Carburetor Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    140 F.2d 714 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 30 times

    No. 12636. February 21, 1944. On Petition to Review and on Request for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings on petition of Carter Carburetor Corporation against the National Labor Relations Board to review an order of the board requiring petitioner to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and, on request of board, for enforcement of order. Petition denied and order enforced. William R. Gentry, of St. Louis, Mo. (N.A. Stancliffe and John L. Farrell, both