§

Jolanda Jordan, Appellant, v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific/Western Area), Agency.

01961104 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 1, 1998)
Jolanda Jordan, Appellant, v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific/Western Area), Agency.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,663 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Roberts v. Morton

    549 F.2d 158 (10th Cir. 1976)   Cited 62 times
    In Roberts the court rejected appellants' argument that summary judgment and dismissal on the pleadings was erroneous, finding that the evidence supporting the decision was substantial "when viewed in light of the entire record, including the body of evidence opposed to the agency's view." Id.