John Morrell & Co.

7 Cited authorities

Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.
380 U.S. 263 (1965) Cited 168 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.
596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 101 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.
711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983) Cited 62 times
Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control
Alphin Aircraft, Inc. v. Henson
785 F.2d 304 (4th Cir. 1986) Cited 11 times
No. 84-1871. Decided February 3, 1986. Appeal from D.Md. AFFIRMED.
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Plasma Corp.
626 F.2d 1287 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 16 times
No. 79-2970. October 2, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., L. Joseph Ferrara, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Huey, Camper Guilday, Thomas J. Guilday, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before KRAVITCH, HENDERSON and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges. HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter referred to as the "Board") petitions for enforcement of its order finding Southern
Property Resources Corp. v. N.L.R.B
863 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Cited 8 times
Stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. NLRB , 362 F.2d 466, 470 (9th Cir. 1966) )
Wis. River Val. Dist. Council, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
532 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1976) Cited 11 times
In Wisconsin River Valley Dist. Council v. NLRB, 532 F.2d 47 (1976), the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also took a position seemingly at odds with the judgment under review here.

John Morrell & Co.

7 Cited authorities

Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.

Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control

Alphin Aircraft, Inc. v. Henson

N.L.R.B. v. Southern Plasma Corp.

Property Resources Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. NLRB , 362 F.2d 466, 470 (9th Cir. 1966) )

Wis. River Val. Dist. Council, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

In Wisconsin River Valley Dist. Council v. NLRB, 532 F.2d 47 (1976), the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit also took a position seemingly at odds with the judgment under review here.