§

Jeff MacTaggart Masonry, LLC d/b/a JM2

363 NLRB No. 149 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Jeff MacTaggart Masonry, LLC d/b/a JM2

8 Cited authorities

  1. Staub v. Proctor Hosp.

    562 U.S. 411 (2011)   Cited 1,384 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a person who "did not intend to cause dismissal" cannot be deemed "responsible" for the dismissal, even if the dismissal was the "result" or "foreseeable consequence" of the person's actions

  2. Caine v. Hardy

    503 U.S. 936 (1992)   Cited 103 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 / Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 doctrine

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

    516 U.S. 85 (1995)   Cited 85 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 48 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  6. Hartman Bros. Heating Air v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.3d 1110 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Hartman Bros. Heating Air Conditioning, Inc., the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals found that a "salt" may lie to get a job "if the lie concerns merely his status as a salt, union organizer, or union supporter and not his qualifications for the job."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fluor Daniel

    161 F.3d 953 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Making distinction between union organizer who will exercise statutory right to organize as opposed to an employee who has merely worked for a union contractor

  8. Sheet Metal Workers, v. N.L.R.B

    561 F.3d 497 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 07-1479, 08-1009, 08-1039, 08-1081. Argued February 17, 2009. Decided April 3, 2009. On Petitions for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of Orders of the National Labor Relations Board. Michael T. Anderson argued the Standing and the Merits of the Board's Oil Capitol Rule for petitioner Sheet Metal Workers International Association. With him on the briefs were Arlus J. Stephens and Loren Gibson. Michael J. Stapp argued the Standing and the Merits of the Board's Oil Capitol Rule for