§

Jacobs Transfer, Inc.

227 N.L.R.B. 1231 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Jacobs Transfer, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.

    415 U.S. 36 (1974)   Cited 2,868 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

  2. Smith v. Evening News Assn

    371 U.S. 195 (1962)   Cited 815 times
    Holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union

  3. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347

    417 U.S. 1 (1974)   Cited 129 times
    Holding when a remedy is found to be an abuse of discretion "remand to the agency for reconsideration ... is ordinarily the reviewing court's proper course"

  5. NLRB v. United Broth., Carpenters Joiners

    531 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 28 times
    Upholding Board's conclusion where employer had "not met its burden of negativing the General Counsel's findings"

  6. Int'l Ladies' Garment Wkrs. Un., v. N.L.R.B

    501 F.2d 823 (D.C. Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times
    In International Ladies' Garment Workers Union v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 823 (D.C. Cir. 1974), this court sustained an appeal from the Labor Board's General Counsel's decision to withdraw a complaint in comparable circumstances; the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(f), contains a substantially identical appeal provision ("Any person aggrieved by a final order of the Board...").

  7. Poole Foundry Mach. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    192 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Poole the court upheld the Board's bargaining order, concluding that the employer's withdrawal of recognition of the union based on a decertification petition signed by sixty-four of sixty-six employees within four months of the employer's settlement agreement with the union violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. General Metals Products Company

    410 F.2d 473 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 3 times

    No. 18374. April 11, 1969. Seth Rosen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Edith E. Nash, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. William E. Fortas, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent; Carroll C. Gilpin, Tralles, Hoffmeister Gilpin, St. Louis, Mo., Fortas DeHart, Memphis, Tenn., on brief. Before O'SULLIVAN, PECK, and COMBS, Circuit Judges. COMBS, Circuit Judge

  9. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,049 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB