§

Ironworkers District Council Of The Pacific North-West And International Association Of Bridge, Structural And Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 751

293 N.L.R.B. 570 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Ironworkers District Council Of The Pacific North-West And International Association Of Bridge, Structural And Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 751

5 Cited authorities

  1. W.R. Grace Co. v. Rubber Workers

    461 U.S. 757 (1983)   Cited 1,078 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitrator's conclusion that he was not bound by a prior arbitrator's decision was binding on the federal courts

  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 976 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  3. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  4. N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Bridge

    549 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 5 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Etc., 549 F.2d at 641, we enforced an order of the N.L.R.B. based on the N.L. R.B. finding that an employer was not bound by a jurisdictional decision of the AFL-CIO dispute board because the employer had not expressly consented to be bound and had not participated in the submission of the dispute to that body.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. L. Un. 3, Inter. Bro. of El. Wkrs

    339 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 33, Docket 28829. Argued October 26, 1964. Decided December 4, 1964. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Lee M. Modjeska, Paula Omansky, Attorneys, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: