§

International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America, Local 444 (Security Support

360 N.L.R.B. 430 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America, Local 444 (Security Support

4 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,196 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  4. STAGEHANDS REFER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELA

    315 F. App'x 318 (2d Cir. 2009)   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 07-2126-ag (L), 07-3103-ag (xap). March 12, 2009. Petition of Petitioners-Cross-Respondents for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated August 31, 2006. Petition of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") for the enforcement of that Order. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED and the cross-petition for enforcement is GRANTED. Leon M. Rosenblatt, Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt, West