International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 492 (Fire & Ice Productions, Inc.)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,623 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,071 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
  3. Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers

    493 U.S. 67 (1989)   Cited 299 times
    Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 880 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.

    412 U.S. 67 (1973)   Cited 49 times
    Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
  6. STAGEHANDS REFER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELA

    315 F. App'x 318 (2d Cir. 2009)   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 07-2126-ag (L), 07-3103-ag (xap). March 12, 2009. Petition of Petitioners-Cross-Respondents for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated August 31, 2006. Petition of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") for the enforcement of that Order. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED and the cross-petition for enforcement is GRANTED. Leon M. Rosenblatt, Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt, West

  7. Boilermakers Local No. 374 v. N.L.R.B

    852 F.2d 1353 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 13 times
    In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec Wkrs., Local 11

    772 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    No. 84-7439. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1985. Decided September 24, 1985. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard, Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner N.L.R.B. Robert Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-intervenors Loveall, Sokol and Mott. Elizabeth R. Lishner, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Ironworkers Local Union No. 505

    794 F.2d 1474 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 5 times
    Upholding Board's determination that union acted arbitrarily where it deviated from union's written hiring hall referral rules — rules not specified by the collective bargaining agreement
  10. Int'l Union of Operating Engr. v. N.L.R.B

    496 F.2d 1308 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 6 times

    No. 73-1760. Argued January 29, 1974. Decided May 31, 1974. Louis S. Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner; Alan S. Belkin, Belkin Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief. Stuart Rosenblum, N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David Miller, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National