§

Independence Residences, Inc.

355 N.L.R.B. 724 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Independence Residences, Inc.

38 Cited authorities

  1. Gregory v. Ashcroft

    501 U.S. 452 (1991)   Cited 1,001 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding Missouri's judicial age limitation of 70 rationally related to such legitimate purposes as avoiding laborious testing of older judges' physical and mental acuity, promoting orderly attrition of judges, and recognizing that judges' remoteness from public view makes determination of competency, and removal from office, more difficult than for other office-holders

  2. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,557 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  4. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 732 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

  5. Machinists v. Wisconsin Emp. Rel. Comm'n

    427 U.S. 132 (1976)   Cited 463 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law is preempted where it would upset the congressionally defined balance of power between management and labor by regulating activity Congress deliberately left unregulated

  6. Hague v. C.I.O

    307 U.S. 496 (1939)   Cited 1,615 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to establish a claim under the Privileges and Immunities Clause, plaintiffs must allege discrimination on the basis of out-of-state residency

  7. Wisconsin Dept. of Industry v. Gould Inc.

    475 U.S. 282 (1986)   Cited 263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state's use of its spending power to sanction certain conduct unrelated to the state contract at issue was regulatory

  8. Garner v. Teamsters Union

    346 U.S. 485 (1953)   Cited 690 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Garner the emphasis was not on two conflicting labor statutes but rather on two similar remedies, one state and one federal, brought to bear on precisely the same conduct.

  9. Thomas v. Collins

    323 U.S. 516 (1945)   Cited 886 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"

  10. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  11. Section 211-A - Prohibition against use of funds

    N.Y. Lab. Law § 211-A   Cited 2 times

    1. The legislature hereby finds and declares that sound fiscal management requires vigilance to ensure that funds appropriated by the legislature for the purchase of goods and provision of needed services are ultimately expended solely for the purpose for which they were appropriated. The legislature finds and declares that when public funds are appropriated for the purchase of specific goods and/or the provision of needed services, and those funds are instead used to encourage or discourage union