§
IN THE MATTER OF YAU

27 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,929 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 38,587 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

  3. Wong Sun v. United States

    371 U.S. 471 (1963)   Cited 12,336 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding evidence stemming from Fourth Amendment violations must be excluded from trial as fruit of the poisonous tree

  4. United States v. Calandra

    414 U.S. 338 (1974)   Cited 3,196 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the exclusionary rule provides that "evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and seizure"

  5. Nardone v. United States

    308 U.S. 338 (1939)   Cited 1,587 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search

  6. Gelbard v. United States

    408 U.S. 41 (1972)   Cited 392 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under 18 U.S.C. § 2515, a witness called before a grand jury can refuse to answer questions based on information obtained in violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968

  7. Weeks v. United States

    232 U.S. 383 (1914)   Cited 2,601 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment must be excluded in federal court

  8. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

    251 U.S. 385 (1920)   Cited 1,715 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that attempts to use information gleaned from an illegal search "reduces the Fourth Amendment to a form of words"

  9. Bridges v. Wixon

    326 U.S. 135 (1945)   Cited 461 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding only that a court may not admit hearsay for substantive, as opposed to impeachment, purposes

  10. United States v. Campos-Serrano

    404 U.S. 293 (1971)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that possession of a counterfeit alien registration receipt card was not an offense under Section 1546 because such cards were not "required" for entry

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents

    18 U.S.C. § 1546   Cited 1,259 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement in immigration documents

  13. Section 287.3 - Disposition of cases of aliens arrested without warrant

    8 C.F.R. § 287.3   Cited 149 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an alien arrested without a warrant and placed in formal proceedings be apprised of the reason for his arrest, his right to representation, and that any statement he makes may be used against him in a subsequent proceeding

  14. Section 264.1 - Registration and fingerprinting

    8 C.F.R. § 264.1   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Enabling regulation for the NSEERS program