§

In the Matter of Perez-Valle

17 I&N Dec. 581 (B.I.A. 1980)
In the Matter of Perez-Valle

22 Cited authorities

  1. Ashe v. Swenson

    397 U.S. 436 (1970)   Cited 3,541 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause prevents a defendant acquitted of robbing one participant at a poker game from being prosecuted for robbing any of the other participants at the same game

  2. Standefer v. United States

    447 U.S. 10 (1980)   Cited 563 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an aider and abettor can be convicted of a charge even if the principal is acquitted

  3. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 749 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  4. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones v. United States

    409 U.S. 232 (1972)   Cited 412 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the forfeiture of goods for a failure to pay import duties on them is a "reasonable form of liquidated damages," as the more expensive the illegally imported good, the more the government has likely missed out on revenue

  5. Helvering v. Mitchell

    303 U.S. 391 (1938)   Cited 1,006 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that civil tax penalties are remedial

  6. Emich Motors v. General Motors

    340 U.S. 558 (1951)   Cited 454 times
    Holding that "plaintiffs are entitled to introduce the prior judgment to establish prima facie all matters of fact and law necessarily decided by the conviction and the verdict on which it was based"

  7. United States v. Ball

    163 U.S. 662 (1896)   Cited 976 times
    Holding that an acquittal is "final, and [can] not be reviewed, on error or otherwise, without putting [a defendant] twice in jeopardy, and thereby violating the constitution"

  8. Local 167 v. United States

    291 U.S. 293 (1934)   Cited 219 times
    In Local 167 v. United States, 291 U.S. 293, the judgment and decree were affirmed without change, the Court observing, at 299: "The United States is entitled to effective relief....

  9. Pena-Cabanillas v. United States

    394 F.2d 785 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 117 times
    Finding 8 U.S.C. § 1326, which criminalizes illegal reentry, was "not based on any common law crime"

  10. Standlee v. Rhay

    557 F.2d 1303 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that a state parole board is not precluded from finding a parole violation based on alleged criminal activity of which a prisoner was acquitted

  11. Rule 59 - New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59   Cited 44,359 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a motion to alter or amend judgment must be filed within 28 days after entry of judgment

  12. Section 1326 - Reentry of removed aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1326   Cited 31,275 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Defining offense elements

  13. Rule 50 - Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 50   Cited 13,806 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Allowing "renewed motion"

  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  15. Section 911 - Citizen of the United States

    18 U.S.C. § 911   Cited 374 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting noncitizens from asserting U.S. citizenship

  16. Section 287.6 - Proof of official records

    8 C.F.R. § 287.6   Cited 184 times
    Setting forth the appropriate procedure by which a record is certified by a Canadian governmental entity