Holding that the immigration court was not required to send a hearing notice to an alien's attorney when the attorney filed his notice of appearance after the hearing notice was sent to the alien
Holding that where the IJ failed fully "to examine the particulars of the case before him prior to . . . denying the motion to reopen . . . a remand is advisable"
Examining § 242B but applying the pre- § 242B procedures when both the order to show cause and the notice of hearing were issued prior to June 13, 1992