In re Acevedo

12 Cited authorities

  1. Romero v. Barr

    937 F.3d 282 (4th Cir. 2019)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the INA permits immigration judges to control their own dockets
  2. Morales v. Barr

    963 F.3d 629 (7th Cir. 2020)   Cited 19 times
    Rejecting Castro-Tum and reasoning that the Attorney General improperly attempts to create a new regulation "under the guise of interpreting a regulation"
  3. Sanchez v. Attorney Gen. U.S.

    997 F.3d 113 (3d Cir. 2021)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that Castro Tum was wrongly decided and declining to abide by it
  4. Gonzalez v. Garland

    16 F.4th 131 (4th Cir. 2021)   Cited 9 times
    Stating standard of review
  5. Garcia-DeLeon v. Garland

    999 F.3d 986 (6th Cir. 2021)   Cited 6 times

    No. 20-3957 06-04-2021 Carlos Alfonso GARCIA-DELEON, Petitioner, v. Merrick B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. ON BRIEF: David E. Funke, DAVID FUNKE IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, Louisville, Kentucky, for Petitioner. Yanal H. Yousef, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Cynthia M. Nunez, WALKER & ASSOCIATES OF MICHIGAN, P.C., Detroit, Michigan, for Amicus Curiae American Immigration Lawyers Association. ON BRIEF: David E. Funke, DAVID FUNKE IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP

  6. Arangure v. Garland

    No. 19-4025 (6th Cir. Feb. 23, 2022)

    19-4025 02-23-2022 RAMON JASSO ARANGURE, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PER CURIAM. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE UNITED STATES BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS BEFORE: THAPAR, BUSH, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Ramon Jasso Arangure lived in the United States as a lawful permanent resident. After he pled guilty to first-degree home invasion, the Department of Homeland Security initiated removal. But the removal didn't

  7. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,986 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  8. Section 1245.2 - Application

    8 C.F.R. § 1245.2   Cited 198 times
    Granting "exclusive jurisdiction" over the issue to the IJ once removal proceedings are initiated
  9. Section 1240.1 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.1   Cited 170 times
    Granting immigration judge in removal proceeding authority to determine applications for adjustment of status
  10. Section 1003.10 - Immigration judges

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.10   Cited 85 times
    Authorizing Director to "designate . . . temporary immigration judges for renewable terms not to exceed six months"
  11. Section 1238.1 - Proceedings under section 238(b) of the Act

    8 C.F.R. § 1238.1   Cited 18 times
    Providing for expedited removal proceedings which do not require an NTA
  12. Section 1216.4 - Joint petition to remove conditional basis of lawful permanent resident status for alien spouse

    8 C.F.R. § 1216.4   Cited 9 times

    (a)Filing the petition - (1)General procedures. Within the 90-day period immediately preceding the second anniversary of the date on which the alien obtained permanent residence, the alien and the alien's spouse who filed the original immigrant visa petition or fiance/fiancee petition through which the alien obtained permanent residence must file a Petition to Remove the Conditions on Residence (Form I-751) with the Service. The petition shall be filed within this time period regardless of the amount