§

IATSE Local 8 (1. Elliott-Lewis Corp., 2. Freeman)

369 N.L.R.B. 67 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
IATSE Local 8 (1. Elliott-Lewis Corp., 2. Freeman)

6 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,196 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,071 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

  3. Steelworkers v. Rawson

    495 U.S. 362 (1990)   Cited 568 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union could contractually undertake, in collective bargaining agreement, other duties towards member employees in addition to statutorily-imposed duty of fair representation

  4. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  5. Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    635 F. App'x 480 (10th Cir. 2015)   Cited 1 times

    No. 14-9605 No. 14-9613 12-03-2015 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 627, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Timothy M. Tymkovich Chief Judge (NLRB No. 17-CB-072671) (Petition for Review) ORDER AND JUDGMENT Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, GORSUCH, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however

  6. Holsum de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.3d 265 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 3 times
    Finding substantial evidence of knowledge of union activities conducted in plain view in an open parking lot where the activities "could very well have been observed by any number of supervisors and managers"