§
I. Posner, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Co.

    282 U.S. 555 (1931)   Cited 1,109 times
    Holding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."

  3. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 367 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  4. Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board

    324 U.S. 9 (1945)   Cited 423 times
    Holding "successors and assigns" are liable for contempt if they are properly within the scope of the injunction under Rule 65(d)

  5. Nathanson v. Labor Board

    344 U.S. 25 (1952)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

  6. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  8. Nabors v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”

  9. N.L.R.B. v. C.C.C. Associates, Inc.

    306 F.2d 534 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 34 times

    Nos. 246, 302, Docket 27254, 27313. Argued May 23, 1962. Decided July 30, 1962. Stephen B. Goldberg, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and Mary Louise Griffin, on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Charles R. Katz, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for C.C.C. Associates, Inc., et al. James V. Altieri, New York City, for

  10. F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    121 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 36 times

    No. 276. July 2, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by F.W. Woolworth Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the board to enforce its order. Petition to review the order denied, and request for enforcement of order as modified in accordance with opinion granted. Thomas I. Sheridan and Howard L. Klein, both of New York City, for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Ernest