7 Cited authorities
Billeci v. United States
184 F.2d 394 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 145 timesHolding inter alia that use of "must find the defendant guilty" was improper; proper instruction required "should"
Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
93 F.2d 985 (4th Cir. 1938) Cited 67 timesNo. 4229. January 4, 1938. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Appalachian Electric Power Company to review a cease and desist order entered by the National Labor Relations Board in a proceeding commenced before the Board by a complaint filed in behalf of the International Brotherhood of Electric Workers, Local Union No. 906, charging that the Appalachian Electric Power Company had engaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce
Battaglia v. United States
349 F.2d 556 (9th Cir. 1965) Cited 13 timesNo. 19513. July 12, 1965. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1965. Burton Marks, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., John K. Van de Kamp, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Crim. Div., J. Brin Schulman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Asst. Chief, Crim. Div., Benj. S. Farber, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before HAMLEY and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge: Following trial to a jury, appellant and his codefendant, Harold Tenner, were convicted
National Labor v. Shen-Valley Meat Packers
211 F.2d 289 (4th Cir. 1954) Cited 19 timesNo. 6719. Argued January 12, 1954. Decided March 6, 1954. Horce Herrick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C., and Irving M. Herman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, New York City, on brief), for petitioner. Lawrence P. Solomon, Washington, D.C. (Joseph B. Danzansky and Milton Quint, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent Amalgamated
Riggs Distler Company v. N.L.R.B
327 F.2d 575 (4th Cir. 1963) Cited 7 timesNo. 8988. Argued October 1, 1963. Decided December 27, 1963. Everett L. Buckmaster and C. Gordon Haines, Baltimore, Md. (Wright, Robertson Dowell, and Buckmaster, White, Mindel Clarke, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for petitioner. Robert A. Armstrong, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for respondent
United States v. Lewis
87 F. Supp. 970 (D.D.C. 1950) Cited 19 timesRecording made by device attached to telephone and, on separate calls, stenographic records made by person listening over extension phone
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,086 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"