§

Hot Springs Aluminum Processors, Inc.

162 N.L.R.B. 1293 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Hot Springs Aluminum Processors, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Symons Manufacturing Co.

    328 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 14305. March 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Michael N. Sohn, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John Harrington and Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and KNOCH, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Coachman's Inn

    357 F.2d 134 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 4 times

    No. 18003. March 3, 1966. William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C.J. Lincoln, of House, Holmes Jewell, Little Rock, Ark., Robert B. Hill, of House, Holmes Jewell, Little Rock, Ark., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges, and VAN PELT, District

  6. Gullett Gin Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    179 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 15 times

    No. 12798. January 30, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1950. Conrad Meyer, III, New Orleans, La., Lawrence A. Molony, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. I.J. Gromfine, Attorney, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nat. Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. While the order sought to be enforced contains provisions ordering the respondent to cease

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Willow Maintenance Corp.

    332 F.2d 367 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 1 times

    No. 422, Docket 28658. Argued May 13, 1964. Decided May 13, 1964. Seymour Strongin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Stephen A. Cohen, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander and W. Harvey Mayer, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Biscuit Co.

    208 F.2d 52 (8th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 14829. November 19, 1953. Rehearing Denied December 10, 1953. Bernard Dunau, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and H.T. Herrick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Harold A. Thomas, Jr., St. Louis, Mo. (N.W. Hartman, and Fordyce, Mayne, Hartman, Renard Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for