Hospital of Barstow Inc., d/b/a Barstow Community Hospital

18 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 708 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  2. Arshal v. U.S.

    449 U.S. 1077 (1981)   Cited 205 times
    Discussing good faith in context of a § 215 violation
  3. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
  4. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
  5. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  6. Arlook v. S. Lichtenberg Co.

    952 F.2d 367 (11th Cir. 1992)   Cited 68 times
    Holding district court's inquiry "limited to evaluating whether Board's theories of law and facts are not insubstantial and frivolous"
  7. Ahearn v. Jackson Hosp. Corp.

    351 F.3d 226 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 45 times
    Concluding that a union that was "quite new and had not even signed its first contract" was "highly susceptible to management misconduct"
  8. Torrington Extend-A-Care Emp. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    17 F.3d 580 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that Board could rely on circumstantial evidence to establish one person's knowledge of another's union activities
  9. Unbelievable v. Nat. Labor Relations Bd.

    118 F.3d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Applying the American Rule to National Labor Relations Board proceedings
  10. Waterbury Hotel Management, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    314 F.3d 645 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that it was proper to infer from supervisor statements that "hiring decisions were motivated by anti-union animus"
  11. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 11,129 times   119 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"