§
Horton's Market

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 299 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  4. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 90 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    423 F.2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 42 times
    In Frick itself, we upheld the Board policy of applying an irrebuttable presumption of continued majority status for a "reasonable period of time" to voluntarily recognized unions, and applying a rebuttable presumption thereafter. 423 F.2d at 1332.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Broad Street Hosp. and Medical Ctr.

    452 F.2d 302 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 12 times
    In Broad Street, supra, we held that the irrebuttable presumption which we upheld in Frick applies equally to a voluntarily recognized union even where the recognition was never reduced to writing.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Harbison-Fischer Manufacturing Co.

    304 F.2d 738 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 19 times

    No. 19105. June 20, 1962. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges. GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of its order against Harbison-Fischer

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Borden Company

    392 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 13 times

    No. 24294. March 4, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert M. Lieber, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., NLRB, for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before JONES, WISDOM and DYER, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: February 5, 1965, two employees of The Borden Company began a low key union drive to obtain union representation of the Company's employees

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Montgomery Ward Co.

    399 F.2d 409 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times
    Finding that a voluntarily recognized union representative, just like a certified representative, must be bargained with, in good faith, for a reasonable time before a decertification petition will be allowed