Horn Manufacturing Co., Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.

    303 U.S. 41 (1938)   Cited 1,426 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
  3. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  4. Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.

    315 U.S. 685 (1942)   Cited 39 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid

  5. Matter of S W Fine Foods, Inc.

    166 N.E.2d 853 (N.Y. 1960)   Cited 32 times

    Argued January 20, 1960 Decided March 24, 1960 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, THOMAS A. AURELIO, J. Murray E. Harston and J. David Delman for appellant. Walter M. Colleran for respondent. Order affirmed, with costs. In construing the language of this collective bargaining agreement as requiring the employer to pay its employees for Columbus Day, the arbitrator acted within his powers and is not chargeable with misconduct under section 1462

  6. Matter of Don Juan, Inc.

    261 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)   Cited 1 times

    February 21, 1941. Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.

  7. Matter of Goodman v. Diamond T. Motor Car Company

    222 App. Div. 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

    November, 1927. Present — Cochrane, P.J., Van Kirk, Hinman, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.