Hong Kong NETEASE Interactive Entertainment Limited
30 Cited authorities
Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.
469 U.S. 189 (1985) Cited 943 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that an incontestable mark cannot be challenged as merely descriptive
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.
514 U.S. 159 (1995) Cited 567 times 51 Legal AnalysesHolding companies may not "inhibit[] legitimate competition" by trademarking desirable features to "put competitors at a significant non-reputation-related disadvantage"
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc.
575 U.S. 138 (2015) Cited 231 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding proceeding before the PTO's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board can have preclusive effect
Coach Services, Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC
668 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Cited 106 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that it is the opposer's burden to prove fame of its mark
In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 190 times 32 Legal AnalysesReciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
On-Line Careline, Inc. v. America Online
229 F.3d 1080 (Fed. Cir. 2000) Cited 77 timesApplying Recot in analyzing the similarity of services
Recot, Inc. v. Becton
214 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000) Cited 57 timesHolding that the Board legally erred in not according sufficient weight to evidence of a mark's fame in a likelihood of confusion analysis, vacating, and remanding for further consideration
Herbko Intern., Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc.
308 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 2002) Cited 45 timesExplaining that proprietary rights are necessary to show priority of use when petitioning for cancellation under section 2(d)
Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. Lion Capital LLP
746 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2014) Cited 25 timesReviewing the weight given to the similarity-of-the-marks factor for legal error
In re Nat. Data Corp.
753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985) Cited 73 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »