§

Holy Cross Health d/b/a Holy Cross Hospital

05-CA-182154 (N.L.R.B. Jul. 21, 2017)
Holy Cross Health d/b/a Holy Cross Hospital

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 321 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  3. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 220 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms

  5. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  6. Conagra Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    813 F.3d 1079 (8th Cir. 2016)   Cited 4 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14–3771 15–1049. 02-19-2016 CONAGRA FOODS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 75, Intervenor. ConAgra Foods, Inc., Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 75, Intervenor. Chad P. Richter, argued, Ross M. Gardner, Omaha, NE, for Petitioner. Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, argued, Washington, DC, for Respondent. James B. Coppess, argued

  7. Unbelievable v. Nat. Labor Relations Bd.

    118 F.3d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Applying the American Rule to National Labor Relations Board proceedings

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. Eastern Maine Medical Center v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Affirming bargaining order "in view of the serious and pervasive violations disclosed in the record"

  10. St. John's Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    557 F.2d 1368 (10th Cir. 1977)   Cited 23 times
    In St. John this Court denied enforcement to that portion of the Board's order which permitted solicitation and distribution of union materials in areas of the hospital to which patients had access. Alternatively the Court found that the Board's definition of "strictly patient care areas" (the only places it would permit the no-solicitation rule to operate) must be interpreted to include halls, stairways, elevators and waiting rooms accessible to patients.

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,474 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

  12. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,086 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"