§

Heinrich Motors, Inc.

166 N.L.R.B. 783 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Heinrich Motors, Inc.

25 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Cornell v. T.V. Development Corp.

    17 N.Y.2d 69 (N.Y. 1966)   Cited 115 times

    Argued January 11, 1966 Decided February 24, 1966 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, PAUL J. WIDLITZ, J. Stanley Goldman for appellant. Jack C. Brill for respondent. SCILEPPI, J. Plaintiff was hired as General Manager by the defendant T.V. Development Corp. for a five-year period starting in March, 1962, at an annual salary of $20,000. The employment contract contained covenants not to compete and that all inventions by the plaintiff would be

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Capitol Fish Company

    294 F.2d 868 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Housekeeping Statute "cannot be construed to establish authority in the executive departments to determine whether certain papers and records are privileged," nor can it "bar a judicial determination of the question of privilege or a demand for the production of evidence found not privileged"

  7. Singer Sewing Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    329 F.2d 200 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    Finding misconduct where there was prima facie evidence that agency violated statute previously construed by multiple courts of appeals (citing Overnite Transp. Co. v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1963))

  8. Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 32 times
    Giving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    366 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 23 times

    No. 19448. September 30, 1966. Melvin J. Welles, Paul Elkind, Robert B. Schwartz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge. William Harold Cox, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: We hope that this opinion proves

  10. General Engineering, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 367 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 22 times
    In General Engineering, the Board attempted to use § 10(b) to shield Board employees from subpoenas for evidence in the employees' possession.