§

Harborlite Corporation

27-CA-021386 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 8, 2010)
Harborlite Corporation

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ancor Concepts, Inc.

    166 F.3d 55 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 2 times

    No. 98-4140. Argued: December 2, 1998. Decided: January 15, 1999. Application For Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, concluding that an employer violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act through statements made to its employees' union following an economic lockout. Enforcement denied. Margaret Gaines, Esq. National Labor Relations Board Office of the Regional Director

  5. International Paper Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times

    No. 95-1606 Argued October 24, 1996 Decided June 27, 1997 Stephen M. Shapiro argued the cause for the petitioner. Timothy S. Bishop and Andrew E. Zelman were on brief. Evan M. Tager entered an appearance. David A. Fleischer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on brief. Robert D. Kurnick argued the cause for the intervenors and for amicus curiae AFL-CIO

  6. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    829 F.2d 458 (3d Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times

    No. 86-3641. Argued June 19, 1987. Decided September 25, 1987. David Silberman, Laurence Gold (argued), Michael R. Fanning, Intern. Union of Operating Engineers, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Montalbano (argued), David Solomon, Schneider, Cohen, Solomon, Leder and Montalbano, Jersey City, N.J. (Michael H. Gottesman, Robert M. Weinberg, David A. Sklansky, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Robert E. Allen, Victoria A. Higman (argued), Elliott Moore, Rosemary M. Collyer, N.L.R.B., Washington