Hallam & Boggs Truck and Implement Co.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 504 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
United States v. Vrilium Products Co.
185 F.2d 3 (7th Cir. 1950) Cited 8 timesNo. 10160. November 13, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 15, 1950. Richard B. Austin, Samuel Morgan, Leslie E. Salter, and Morgan, Salter Sellery, all of Chicago, Ill., for appellants. Otto Kerner, Jr., U.S. Atty., Joseph E. Tobin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., Joseph L. Maguire, Attorney, Federal Security Agency, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for appellee. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and FINNEGAN, Circuit Judges. FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants seek to reverse a conviction