§

Gross Electric, Inc.

366 NLRB No. 81 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Gross Electric, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 456 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

  2. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 48 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  5. Adams & Assocs., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    871 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that although a successor contractor "was required to offer unit employees a right of first refusal under the EO and [Department of Labor (DOL)] regulations, this right of first refusal did not constitute a mandated blanket offer to all employees"

  6. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  7. Yesterday's Children, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times
    Timing of reprimand, coming soon after protected activities, "raise[d] suspicions"

  8. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation v. N.L.R.B

    297 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding substantial evidence in the record to support the NLRB's finding that an employer violated § 8 by suspending an employee because she engaged in protected union activities

  9. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    147 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 97-70646, 97-70841 Argued and Submitted April 13, 1998 — San Francisco, California. Filed June 22, 1998 Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 32-CA-13189 COUNSEL Allen J. Gross, Mitchell, Silberberg Knupp, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner-cross-respondent. James S. Scott A. Donald Rhoads, National Labor Relations Board, Oakland, California; Aileen A. Armstrong, Office of the General Counsel, National