Greater Omaha Packing Co., Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. NLRB v. CWI of Maryland, Inc.

    127 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times
    Enforcing bargaining order where employer constructively discharged all bargaining unit employees
  4. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"
  5. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
  6. Compuware Corporation v. National Relations

    134 F.3d 1285 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that no specific authorization was needed to show concerted activity where an employee had "almost from the beginning of his employment . . . discussed . . . problems with other employees" and made objections on behalf of other employees for their mutual aid or protection
  7. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."
  8. Molon Motor & Coil Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    965 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 91-1885, 91-2222. Argued January 9, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. As Amended July 15, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 27, 1992. John C. Truesdale, Paul J. Spielberg (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Steven L. Gillman (argued), Davi L. Hirsch, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., for Molon Motor Coil Corp. Susan

  9. Ona Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    729 F.2d 713 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times

    No. 82-7308. April 9, 1984. John J. Coleman, Jr., Braxton Schell, Jr., William Michael Warren, Birmingham, Ala., for Ona Corporation. James D. Fagan, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for UAW. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Div. of Enforcement Litigation, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Elaine Patrick, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Petitions for Review of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before TJOFLAT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge. Honorable John Minor Wisdom

  10. JMC Transport, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    776 F.2d 612 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 84-5960, 84-6060. Argued August 22, 1985. Decided November 12, 1985. D. Patton Pelfrey, Charles E. Allen, III (argued), Brown, Todd and Heyburn, James H. Massey, Mark B. Davis, Jr., Louisville, Ky., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Elinor Stillman (argued), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge. MERRITT, Circuit Judge