ยง

Great Chinese American Sewing Co.

227 N.L.R.B. 1670 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Great Chinese American Sewing Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  3. Sakrete of Northern Calif., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times

    No. 18745. May 21, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1964. Graydon, Head Ritchey, William A. McKenzie, Leslie A. Meek, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Arnold Orman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Leon Ardzrooni, Neyhart Grodin, San Francisco, Cal., on behalf of amicus curiae-Freight, Construction, General Drivers Helpers, Local 287. Before MADDEN

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Townhouse T. V. Appliances, Inc.

    531 F.2d 826 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Declining to enforce an order to resume the original business because taking back the subcontracted work would be burdensome

  5. Altemose Construction Company v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.2d 8 (3d Cir. 1975)   Cited 11 times
    In Altemose our Court reversed the Board order under review and remanded the case for reconsideration of the credibility of witnesses and of certain "objective factors" in light of "discrepancies in the [credited] testimony," the "improbability" of certain testimony, the use of improper inferences, and the peculiar history of the dispute.

  6. Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. ยง 158 et seq.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. North Carolina Coastal Motor Lines

    542 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 76-1135, 76-1401. Argued August 25, 1976. Decided September 29, 1976. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner in No. 76-1135 and for respondent in No. 76-1401. Robert A. Valois, Raleigh, N.C. (Frank P. Ward, Jr., Maupin, Taylor Ellis, Raleigh, N.C., on brief), for respondent in No. 76-1135 and for petitioner

  8. Donovan v. N.L.R.B

    520 F.2d 1316 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 9 times
    Finding union members' mass picketing, threats, assaults and some property damage insufficient to sustain the "extraordinary sanction of withholding an otherwise appropriate remedial bargaining order"

  9. A.M. Andrews Co. of Oregon v. N.L.R.B

    236 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14866. August 13, 1956. Alfred A. Hampson, Jr., Ralph R. Bailey, Maguire, Shields, Morrison Bailey, Portland, Or., for petitioners. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, John Francis Lawless, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, ORR and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The determination of the issue raised on this appeal rests almost exclusively on