§

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

100 N.L.R.B. 1494 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Amer. Trucking Ass'ns

    310 U.S. 534 (1940)   Cited 1,673 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding the purpose of the statute should be followed when the literal words would be at odds "with the policy of the legislation as a whole"

  2. Caminetti v. United States

    242 U.S. 470 (1917)   Cited 1,914 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that importation of a woman for immoral purposes may constitutionally be regulated even when it is not for material gain

  3. United States v. Champlin Rfg. Co.

    341 U.S. 290 (1951)   Cited 17 times

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 433. Argued March 8-9, 1951. Decided May 7, 1951. Appellee owns and operates a pipe line from its refinery in Oklahoma to its terminals in other States. It uses the pipe line solely to carry its own refined petroleum products. No other pipe line or refiner has connections with appellee's line, and no other refiner has ever shipped products through it. At each of its terminals, appellee has storage facilities from