19 Cited authorities
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,623 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Jencks v. United States
353 U.S. 657 (1957) Cited 1,100 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that defendants are entitled to obtain the prior statements of persons to government agents when those persons are to testify against the defendants at trial
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.
465 U.S. 822 (1984) Cited 204 times 9 Legal AnalysesHolding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 356 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
United States Smelting, Refining Mining v. Lowe
338 U.S. 954 (1950) Cited 51 timesNo. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court
Good Samaritan Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
858 F.3d 617 (1st Cir. 2017) Cited 10 timesNos. 15-1347 15-1412 Nos. 15-1877 15-1941 05-31-2017 GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. Joseph W. Ambash, Boston, MA, with whom Reyburn W. Lominack, III and Fisher & Phillips LLP, Columbia, SC, were on brief, for Good Samaritan Medical Center. Betsy Ehrenberg, with whom Pyle
N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit
577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009) Cited 16 timesInterpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)
N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.
388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967) Cited 80 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.
Int'l Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
844 F.3d 590 (6th Cir. 2016) Cited 7 timesRecognizing three routes by which a union may be found to have breached its duty of fair representation: by conduct that is "arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith"