Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, Etc.

20 Cited authorities

San Diego Unions v. Garmon
359 U.S. 236 (1959) Cited 2,553 times 33 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional
372 U.S. 10 (1963) Cited 284 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"
Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.
311 U.S. 584 (1941) Cited 338 times
Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 186 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
United Mine Workers v. Coronado Co.
259 U.S. 344 (1922) Cited 411 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that labor union could be sued for antitrust violations and describing the "affirmative legal recognition of their existence and usefulness and provisions for their protection"
Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo
353 U.S. 138 (1957) Cited 143 times
Holding the LMRA inapplicable to the picketing of a foreign ship operated entirely by foreign seamen
Steelworkers v. Labor Board
376 U.S. 492 (1964) Cited 75 times
Stating that section 8(b) prohibits labor unions from engaging in "secondary boycotting" by "exert[ing] pressure on an employer not involved in the relevant labor dispute ('the secondary employer') in order to obtain a favorable result in the ongoing labor dispute with another employer ('the primary employer')"
Coronado Co. v. U.M. Workers
268 U.S. 295 (1925) Cited 124 times
Applying Sherman Act to alleged conspiracy by unions involved in labor dispute to restrain interstate trade in coal
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,086 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Grain Elevator, Flour & Feed Mill Workers, Etc.

20 Cited authorities

Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"

Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

Holding that labor union could be sued for antitrust violations and describing the "affirmative legal recognition of their existence and usefulness and provisions for their protection"

Holding the LMRA inapplicable to the picketing of a foreign ship operated entirely by foreign seamen

Applying Sherman Act to alleged conspiracy by unions involved in labor dispute to restrain interstate trade in coal

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"