§

GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER

361 N.L.R.B. 1294 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Teamsters “General” Local Union No. 200

    723 F.3d 778 (7th Cir. 2013)   Cited 11 times
    Discussing a union's responsibilities under the duty of fair representation

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Special Touch Home Care Servs., Inc.

    708 F.3d 447 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    Docket No. 11–3147–ag. 2013-02-27 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SPECIAL TOUCH HOME CARE SERVICES, INC., Respondent, 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, Intervenor. Jill A. Griffin, Supervisory Attorney (Lafe E. Solomon, Acting General Counsel, Celeste J. Mattina, Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, on the brief), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner

  7. Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)

  8. Glaziers Local Union 558 v. N.L.R.B

    787 F.2d 1406 (10th Cir. 1986)   Cited 9 times
    Applying the same standard to the board whether or not it reached conclusions contrary to the ALJ

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l U. of Operating Engineers

    555 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1977)   Cited 3 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.