§

Gerald Olana, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

0720070025 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 23, 2007)
Gerald Olana, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,619 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,622 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,994 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"

  4. Section 1614.601 - EEO group statistics

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.601   Cited 3 times

    (a) Each agency shall establish a system to collect and maintain accurate employment information on the race, national origin, sex and disability of its employees. (b) Data on race, national origin and sex shall be collected by voluntary self-identification. If an employee does not voluntarily provide the requested information, the agency shall advise the employee of the importance of the data and of the agency's obligation to report it. If the employee still refuses to provide the information, the