§

GC Services Limited Partnership, a limited partnership, and GC Financial Corp., general partner

369 N.L.R.B. 133 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
GC Services Limited Partnership, a limited partnership, and GC Financial Corp., general partner

25 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,863 times   601 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

  2. Rent-A-Ctr. v. Jackson

    561 U.S. 63 (2010)   Cited 2,719 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an arbitration provision is severable from the remainder of the contract," even where the contract containing the arbitration provision is itself an arbitration agreement (quoting Buckeye , 546 U.S. at 445, 126 S.Ct. 1204 )

  3. Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna

    546 U.S. 440 (2006)   Cited 2,027 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing necessarily prevents a court from finding an arbitration clause unenforceable in a contract that it later finds is enforceable

  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.

    500 U.S. 20 (1991)   Cited 3,054 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration

  5. EPIC Sys. Corp. v. Lewis

    138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)   Cited 950 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Concepcion , "courts may not allow a contract defense to reshape traditional individualized arbitration" and "a rule seeking to declare individualized arbitration proceedings off limits" is preempted by the FAA

  6. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.

    514 U.S. 52 (1995)   Cited 1,249 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should be guided by the “cardinal principle of contract construction: that a document should be read to give effect to all of its provisions and to render them consistent with each other”

  7. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.

    415 U.S. 36 (1974)   Cited 2,860 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

  8. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.

    388 U.S. 395 (1967)   Cited 2,975 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts are the proper forum to evaluate a challenge to the validity of an arbitration clause, but that where the entire agreement of which an arbitration clause is but a part is challenged, such evaluation is properly left to the arbitrator

  9. Morton v. Mancari

    417 U.S. 535 (1974)   Cited 1,364 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Indian Commerce Clause empowers Congress to “single Indians out as a proper subject for separate legislation.”

  10. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 974 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  11. Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title

    9 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 12,090 times   210 Legal Analyses
    Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

  12. Section 2 - Validity, irrevocability, and enforcement of agreements to arbitrate

    9 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 11,129 times   119 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal jurisdiction where there is "a transaction involving [interstate] commerce"

  13. Section 173 - Functions of Service

    29 U.S.C. § 173   Cited 380 times
    Providing that the "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes. . . ."

  14. Section 102.9 - Who may file; withdrawal and dismissal

    29 C.F.R. § 102.9   Cited 30 times
    Providing that charges may be withdrawn on request "only with the consent of the regional director"